Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

513 S.W.3d 387

State v. Young

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2017

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2017-03-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2017

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2017-03-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2Orlando Young (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a jury trial convicting him of three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062 (RSMo. 2000), and three counts of first-degree child molestation, in violation of Section 566.067 (RSMo. 2000).

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/513/sw3d/387 · .json · Public domain