Cage v. Auger’s Empirical Analysis
514 F.2d 1231 · 1975
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 1996 · most notably Matlock v. Rose (1984), 438 F. Supp. 455 - Zemina v. Solem (1977)
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Fay v. Noia · Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDEN · Humphrey v. Cady · Giles v. State of Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The wisdom of evidentiary rulings will not be reviewed in Habeas corpus unless they rise to (a) due process standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Brewer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.