Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

514 F.2d 1234

Docket No. 74-4045.

McGee v. Henderson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1975-06-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1975

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Fitzgerald v. Estelle · Edgar C. Worts v. A. L. Dutton, Warden, Georgia State Prison

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1975-06-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Anthony M. DiLeo, New Orleans, La. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., Barbara B. Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., New Orleans, La., Thompson L. Clarke, Dist. Atty., St. Joseph, La., Charles Brackin, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lake Providence, La., John T. Seale, Asst. Dist. Atty., Tallulah, La., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The district court denied the habeas corpus petition of McGee, a state prisoner, without an evidentiary hearing. Giving this pro se application the liberal construction which is required by Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), it appears that the appellant claims he was denied the right to appeal. Without any intimation as to the merits of the case, it is our conclusion that the judgment of the district court denying the petition should be vacated and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing. At the evidentiary hearing, the appellant's proof must meet the standards set forth in Worts v. Dutton, 395 F.2d 341 (5th Cir. 1968) and Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 505 F.2d 1334 (5th Cir. 1974).

¶2

Vacated and remanded.

/514/f2d/1234 · .json · Public domain