Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 514 F.2d 594 - Collins v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Collins v. United Air Lines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

514 F.2d 594 · 1975

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
6
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Mary P. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, Non-Aligned Party. Mary P. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, Non-Aligned Party (1977), Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. Steinbronn (1977)

45 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

40019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Lehigh Valley Co v. Board of Public Utility Com'rs · Jeannette M. GATES, Appellee, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellant · Cunningham v. Litton Industries

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “seeks to redress the original termination”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(w)e express no opinion on the question whether a charge filed within 90 days of United's discontinuance of the 'no marriage' policy would have satisfied the (filing) requirement, I. e., whether the continued existence of that policy may have constituted a continuing violation as to Collins”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.