Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 514 F.3d 539 - In re McDonald

In re McDonald’s Empirical Analysis

514 F.3d 539 · 2008

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
August 2023
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Moore v. United States (2017), In re Watkins (2015)

12 federal appellate ·

200200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Kyles v. Whitley · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Byrd v. Collins · United States of America v. Chucks Emuegbunam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second or successive application [in the district court] only if it determines that the application makes a prima facie showing that the application satisfies the requirements of this subsection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “render[s] irrelevant other possible grounds for dismissal such as ultimate lack of merit, nonexhaustion, procedural default, and the like.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[G]iven the lack of direct evidence linking McDonald to the underlying crimes, Harris's recanting of her trial testimony looms large.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.