Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 514 F.3d 756 - Moore v. Indehar

Moore v. Indehar’s Empirical Analysis

514 F.3d 756 · 2008

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Atkinson v. City of Mountain View (2013), Howard v. Kansas City Police Department (2009)

20 federal appellate · 3 district ·

310200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “bystanders are not seized for Fourth Amendment purposes when struck by an errant bullet in a shootout”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the burden is on the plaintiff to plead and, if presented with a properly supported motion for summary judgment, to present evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that the defendant officer has violated the plaintiff's constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “must show that [the officer] intended to seize [him] through the means of firing his weapon at [him] to establish a Fourth Amendment claim,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.