514 F. Supp. 2d 1139 - Jones v. Rees-Max, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1602 (§ 103 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1635 (§ 125 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1638 (§ 128 of the Truth in Lending Act)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc. · Lagrone v. Johnson · First National Bank of St. Paul v. Ramier · Ministers Life & Casualty Union v. Franklin Park Towers Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Chapter 325N of Minnesota State statutes regulates mortgage foreclosures as part of an overall consumer protection scheme. This Chapter is divided into two distinct sections: (1) §§ 325N.01 through 325N.09 which regulate ’foreclosure consultants’, and (2) §§ 325N.10 through 325N.18 which regulate 'foreclosure purchasers.' ”). . Conclusion of Law ¶ 17 originally stated: SunTrust held a mortgage on the Property in good faith and Plaintiffs do not have standing to rescind the mortgage that SunTrust made to Defendant. Esty v. Cummings, 80 Minn. 516 , 83 N.W. 420 (1900) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.