Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 514 FSUPP2D 577 - Murawski v. Pataki

Murawski v. Pataki’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 15301 (§ 101 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · Mathews v. Eldridge · Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. · Zinermon v. Burch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even in the absence of an opportunity to be heard prior to a BOE decision, however, the statutory provision for an expedited review of that determination by the New York Supreme Court provides adequate pre-deprivation review and satisfies due process requirements.”). . Plaintiff specifically requested (1) the Independence Party enrollment book, (2) the number of enrolled Independence Party voters in the 6th Congressional District, and (3) the number of signatures needed to qualify for ballot access. (SAC ¶¶ 44-45.) As the City Board notes, these three sets of items are arguably”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The policy of liberally construing pro se submissions is driven by the understanding that '[i]mplicit in the right to self-representation is an obligation on the part of the court to make reasonable allowances to protect pro se litigants from inadvertent forfeiture of important rights because of their lack of legal training.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The applicable statute of limitations for § 1983 claims in New York is three years, which begins to run from the moment plaintiff is aware of the injury on which the claim is based.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.