Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 514 SO2D 1343 - Johnson v. Moore

Johnson v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2018

22 state decisions

801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Horton ex rel. Wiginton v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad · 359 So. 2d 368 - Oliver v. Sawyer · 356 So. 2d 156 - Knight v. Davis · Welch v. G.F.C. Credit Corporation · 49 Ala. App. 306 - Taylor v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"a defaulting party has satisfactorily made a showing of a meritorious defense when allegations in an answer or in a motion to set aside the default judgment and its supporting affidavits, if proven at trial, would constitute a complete defense to the action, or when sufficient evidence has been adduced either by way of affidavit or by some other means to warrant submission of the case to the jury. "The allegations set forth in the answer and in the motion must be more than mere bare legal conclusions without factual support; they must counter the cause of action averred in the complaint with specificity — namely, by setting forth relevant legal grounds substantiated by a credible factual basis. Such allegations would constitute a `plausible defense.'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.