State v. Hooks’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · State v. Abbott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The jurisdiction of the trial court is divested and that of the appellate court attaches upon the entering of the order of appeal. Thereafter, the trial court has no jurisdiction to take any action except as otherwise provided by law and to: ⅜ ⅝ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ |3(8) Sentence the defendant pursuant to a conviction under the Habitual Offender Law as set forth in R.S. 15:529.1.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[sjentence the defendant pursuant to a conviction under the Habitual Offender Law as set forth in R.S. 15:529.1.” See also State v. Hooks, 514 So.2d 597, 599 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1987); State v. Lewis, 08-437, p. 6 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/12/08), 1 So.3d 535, 538 . . La. R.S. 15:529.1(G) provides that a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.