Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 514 SO2D 597 - State v. Hooks

State v. Hooks’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · State v. Abbott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jurisdiction of the trial court is divested and that of the appellate court attaches upon the entering of the order of appeal. Thereafter, the trial court has no jurisdiction to take any action except as otherwise provided by law and to: ⅜ ⅝ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ |3(8) Sentence the defendant pursuant to a conviction under the Habitual Offender Law as set forth in R.S. 15:529.1.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[sjentence the defendant pursuant to a conviction under the Habitual Offender Law as set forth in R.S. 15:529.1.” See also State v. Hooks, 514 So.2d 597, 599 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1987); State v. Lewis, 08-437, p. 6 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/12/08), 1 So.3d 535, 538 . . La. R.S. 15:529.1(G) provides that a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.