Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 514 S.W.2d 772 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2008

14 state decisions

601974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mingus, Receiver v. Wadley · Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co. · Trapp v. Shell Oil Co. · Brown v. City of Galveston · Housing Authority v. Higginbotham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In passing upon this question we have the rules stated in Trapp v. Shell Oil Co., 145 Tex. 323 , 198 S.W.2d 424 (1946), to guide us: “ ‘This Court, in testing the constitutionality of a statute, has variably stated the rule as follows: ‘“Ashford v. Goodwin, 103 Tex. 491 , 131 S.W. 535, 537 , Ann.Cas.1913A, 699: “This court must sustain it unless its invalidity be apparent beyond a reasonable doubt.” “‘State v. Hogg, 123 Tex. 568 , 70 S.W.2d 699 ; on rehearing 123 Tex. 568 , 72 S.W.2d 593 : “ * * * the rule is that every possible presumption is in favor of the constitutionality of a statute, and such presumption obtains until the contrary is shown beyond a reasonable doubt.” “ ‘It is stated in the case of Brown v. City of Galveston, 97 Tex. 1 , 75 S.W. 488 , loc.cit. 492: “If there be doubt as to the validity of the law, it is due to the co-ordinate branch of the government that its action should be upheld and its decision accepted by the judicial department.” ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We hold that Section 11 of this Act is in the nature of an affirmative defense, and the burden was upon defendant both to allege and prove the essential facts in order to take advantage of such defense. ... An uninterrupted line of cases hold the burden of proof is also upon a defendant to establish a statutory exclusion of liability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.