Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 514 S.W.2d 942 - Goodwin v. State

Goodwin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 1995
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 1995

11 state decisions

60197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hamling v. United States · Miller v. California · Stanley v. Georgia · Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton · Book Named 'John Cleland's Memoirs of Woman of Pleasure' v. Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Appellants' contention that the court cannot find the material obscene when the State has offered no expert evidence and the defense has presented expert testimony as to its non-obscenity was discussed in Kaplan v. California, 413 U.S. 115 , 93 S.Ct. 2680 , 37 L.Ed.2d 492 (1973). There, the United States Supreme Court clearly stated that the materials themselves are sufficient for the determination even though the defense has introduced countervailing testimony."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.