Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 514 SW3D 227 - Villa v. State

Villa v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso))

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Hooper v. State · Murray, Chad William · Tate v. State · Liverman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to the responsibility of the trier of fact fairly to resolve conflicts in the testimony, to weigh the evidence, and to draw reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “language applies in a prosecution for engaging in organized criminal activity as a member of a criminal street gang. As a matter of grammar and logic, the statute's intent clause applies only to the phrase that immediately follows it-”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “three or more persons having a common identifying sign or symbol or an identifiable leadership who continuously or regularly associate in the commission of criminal activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.