¶1ORDER
¶2David M. Johnson appeals the judgment, entered after a bench trial, convicting him of driving while revoked and failing to properly equip a motor vehicle with two approved headlamps. We find no error has occurred.
¶3No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).