Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 515 F.2d 1053 - Chrysler Corp. v. Department of Transportation

Chrysler Corp. v. Department of Transportation’s Empirical Analysis

515 F.2d 1053 · 1975

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2004 · most notably California v. Block (1982), Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. Patient Advocates of Texas (2004)

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1501975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · J. Gordon Turnbull, Inc. v. Commissioner · South Terminal Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency · Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission · California Citizens Band Accociation, Incorporated, a Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the [Safety Act] practicability requirement was designed primarily to prevent the [Safety Administration] from establishing mandatory safety standards that are economically or technologically infeasible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is clear that an administrative rule as adopted need not be identical to the proposed version of the rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “did not embrace any major subjects that were not described in the notice of proposed rulemaking”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.