Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 515 F.2d 225 - Ed Friedrich, a Division of Crutcher Resources Corporation v. Local No. 780, Iue-Afl-Cio-Clc

Ed Friedrich, a Division of Crutcher Resources Corporation v. Local No. 780, Iue-Afl-Cio-Clc’s Empirical Analysis

515 F.2d 225 · 1975

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably William Aramony v. United Way of America United Way Replacement Benefit Plan United Way Supplemental Benefits Agreement (2001), Anderson v. Alpha Portland Industries, Inc. (1985)

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

100197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co. · Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization · The Boeing Company v. International Union · Affiliated Food Distributors, Inc. v. Local Union No. 229

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Yet, to be consistent with congressional policy in favor of settlement of disputes by the parties through the machinery of arbitration, the judicial inquiry under § 301 must be strictly confined to the question whether the reluctant party did agree to arbitrate the grievance or did agree to give the arbitrator power to make the award he made. An order to arbitrate the particular grievance should not be denied unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute. Doubts should be resolved in favor of coverage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.