Funk v. Tifft’s Empirical Analysis
515 F.2d 23 · 1975
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2013
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ward v. Taggart · Quinn v. Phipps · Sandra J. Douglas, for Herself and as Representative of a Class v. Beneficial Finance Co. Of Anchorage · Mitchell v. Allison · Stevenot v. Norberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Where a broker] failed to make adequate disclosures to the [buyer,] such disclosures should be required. This sort of disclosure requirement finds its analogy in many areas of our law today, especially in statutory enactments designed to protect the unknowing individual from the professional. See, e.g., Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-65 ; Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a-77aa; Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-20 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gyurkey v. Babler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.