Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 515 F.2d 798 - United States v. Willis

United States v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

515 F.2d 798 · 1975

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2000

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

801975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1709 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Morissette v. United States · Stirone v. United States · Russell v. United States · Hagner v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) Pretrial Motions. Any defense, objection, or request which is capable of determination without the trial of the general issue may be raised before trial by motion. * * The following must be raised prior to trial: “(2) Defenses and objections based on defects in the indictment or information (other than that it fails to show jurisdiction in the court or to charge an offense which objections shall be noticed by the court at any time during the pendency of the proceedings); or . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Ex parte Garcia
  2. “the word `embezzle' connotes to both lawyers and laymen that the act was performed with wrongful intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. United States v. Ross

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.