Chacon v. Granata’s Empirical Analysis
515 F.2d 922 · 1975
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Ned L. Siegel, Georgette Sosa Douglas v. Theresa Lepore, Charles E. Burton (2000), Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. Channel Fueling Service, Inc. (1988)
15 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell · Blackmar v. Guerre · United States v. Constantine · City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co. · The Fort Worth National Corporation v. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, Federal Home Loan Bank Board, the Fort Worth National Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board and Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An injunction is appropriate only if the anticipated injury is imminent and irreparable.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“). Id. at 923 . The plaintiffs' complaint alleged that the annexation was the first step in a larger scheme by the City and the Base to deprive them of their annexed property through unlawful zoning ordinances. Id. The plaintiffs' complaint sought a permanent injunction against any further exercise of jurisdiction over the subject lands. Id. at 924 . The district court denied the plaintiffs' challenge to anticipated zoning ordinances as premature, and the Fifth Circuit affirmed. Id. It held that,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“At some point, plaintiffs may be able to show that the annexation was the first step toward a denial of their constitutional right to just compensation. Whatever wrong the annexation might inflict, however, would be merged into the ultimate acts ... the annexation by itself is nothing more than an inchoate wrong that may never ripen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.