Diaz v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis
515 F.3d 149 · 2008
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Bowles v. Russell · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at least until a substantial period of time has elapsed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“brief interval between the entry of a state court order and its receipt a few days later after prompt mailing.”). 4 . In his notice of appeal Earl contended that he was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Earl v. Fabian“how severe an obstacle it is for the prisoner endeavoring to comply with AEDPA's limitations period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.