Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 515 F.3d 511 - United States v. Phinazee

United States v. Phinazee’s Empirical Analysis

515 F.3d 511 · 2008

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Martin (2008), United States v. Abu Ali (2008)

20 federal appellate ·

320200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on United States v. Booker · Gall v. United States · Blakely v. Washington · Rita v. United States · Lockett v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A sentence may be procedurally unreasonable if the district court “did not appreciate the non-mandatory nature of the guidelines, did not correctly calculate the sentencing range under the guidelines, or did not consider the § 3553(a) factors.” (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is that appellate courts must respect the role of district courts and stop substituting their judgment for that of those courts on the front line”). 3 . As the Supreme Court observed in Gall, the sentencing court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.