United States v. Chavers’s Empirical Analysis
515 F.3d 722 · 2008
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2021
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 49 U.S.C. § 46505
Relies on Massaro v. United States · United States v. Turcotte · United States v. Lee · United States v. Moore · United States v. Carroll
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the defendant's statements at the plea colloquy are presumed to be true, the defendant bears a heavy burden of persuasion in showing that such a fair and just reason exists.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]e will uphold a district court's factual findings about the existence of a fair or just reason to withdraw the plea unless they are clearly erroneous, and we will review the district court's ruling on the motion to withdraw for an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.