United States v. Eagle’s Empirical Analysis
515 F.3d 794 · 2008
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Irey (2010), United States v. Farley (2010)
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Crawford v. Washington · United States v. Young · Smith v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“id. at 759 ; (ii) the remarks were not so prejudicial as to deprive Garrett of a fair trial; (iii) the district court's instruction that closing arguments are not evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“serve[d] to alleviate any risk of prejudicial impact,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.