Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 515 N.E.2d 511 - Hickman v. State

Hickman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1991
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Rideout v. United States · Loyd v. State · Ashton v. Anderson · Case v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Defendant's protection under Ashton was lost when he presented on direct examination his history of prior arrests. This opened the door for the State to cross-examine regarding convictions concealed by defendant's direct testimony. Allen v. State (1986), Ind., 495 N.E.2d 180 ; Baker v. State (1978), 267 Ind. 643 , 372 N.E.2d 1174 . We will not permit Ashton to serve as a shield behind which a defendant may present false or misleading evidence. The trial court was correct in permitting the cross-examination." Id. at 513.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.