515 So. 2d 1025 - Hendricks v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1988
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 476 So. 2d 671 - Marquez v. State · 488 So. 2d 62 - Williams v. State · 196 So. 2d 111 - Salomon v. Salomon · 414 So. 2d 228 - Pujals v. Pujals · 424 So. 2d 32 - Wolfe v. Wolfe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The alimony provision, however, specifically provides that the payments made thereunder are in “settlement of all claims the wife may have for temporary and permanent alimony” and that the periodic alimony payments will terminate if the wife remarries. It is not agreed that alimony is given in exchange for any rights the wife might have in the marital property. The alimony provision, being devoid of any indicia that it was part of a true property settlement agreement, was subject to modification pursuant to section 61.14, Florida Statutes (1985). See Pujals v. Pujals, 414 So.2d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Wolfe v. Wolfe, 424 So.2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.