515 So. 2d 115 - Blanco v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably United States v. Rodriguez (1992), 683 So. 2d 1042 - Ex Parte Windsor (1996)
1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Angrist v. United States · 17 Ala. App. 674 - Dennison v. State · 57 Ala. App. 529 - McDonald v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The decision whether to allow or not to allow evidence of collateral crimes or acts as part of the State's case-in-chief rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Probable cause to arrest requires 'knowledge of facts and circumstances which are reasonably trustworthy and which would lead a prudent man to believe that the accused had committed the offense [for which he is arrested].' Blanco v. State , 515 So.2d 115 , 119 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987)."”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. C.M.B. v. State · CMB v. State“`Underhill, Criminal Evidence § 154 (3d ed. 1923).'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.