Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 515 SO2D 17 - Felder v. State

Felder v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2011

12 state decisions

401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson · 456 So. 2d 249 - Ross v. Luton · Reeder v. State Ex Rel. Myers · Eleven Automobiles v. State · 435 So. 2d 50 - JR McCLENNEY AND SON, INC. v. Reimer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Persons to Be Joined if Feasible. A person who is subject to jurisdiction of the court shall be joined as a party in the action if (1) ..., or (2) he claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that the disposition of the action in his absence may (i) as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest....””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The court, when determining parties under Rule 19, should place emphasis on the practical and pragmatic considerations of each case. Provident Trade smen[s ] Bank & Trust v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102 , 88 S.Ct. 733 , 19 L.Ed.2d 936 (1968); Lopez v. Martin Luther King, Jr. Hospital, 97 F.R.D. 24 (C.D.Cal.1983). A determination of whether an interest under Rule 19(a)(2) exists should be viewed from a practical standpoint and should turn on the particulars of the case. Lopez, supra.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.