515 So. 2d 516 - State v. Tupa’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1997
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Angrist v. United States · 376 So. 2d 1240 - State v. Gainey · 373 So. 2d 1284 - State v. Bonanno · 875 So. 2d 918 - State v. Uloho · 380 So. 2d 19 - State v. Eaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Upon motion of the defendant, the court shall order the district attorney to permit or authorize the defendant to inspect and copy, photograph, or otherwise reproduce any results or reports, or copies thereof, of physical or mental examination, and of scientific tests or experiments, made in connection with or material to the particular case, that are in the possession, custody, control or knowledge of the district attorney and intended for use at trial. Exculpatory evidence shall be produced under this article even though it is not intended for use at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Silva
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.