Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 515 So. 2d 654 - State v. Perry

515 So. 2d 654 - State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2017

13 state decisions

801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · James W. Willett v. State of Georgia · Banks v. McGougan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he due process clause imposes no constitutional duty on state trial judges to ascertain a factual basis prior to accepting a guilty plea. . . . Louisiana law, unlike [federal law] has no statutory provision requiring accompaniment of a guilty plea by the recitation of a factual basis.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[T]he due process clause imposes no constitutional duty on state trial judges to ascertain a factual basis prior to accepting a guilty plea....' Louisiana law, unlike Fed.Rule Cr.Proc. 11(f), has no statutory provision requiring accompaniment of a guilty plea by the recitation of a factual basis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the absence of a factual basis when entering a guilty plea does not render the plea constitutionally infirm, if the plea is determined to be made knowingly and intelligently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.