Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 515 So. 2d 86 - Edwards v. State

515 So. 2d 86 - Edwards v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably 710 So. 2d 1276 - Williams v. State (1996), 587 So. 2d 1218 - White v. State (1990)

25 state decisions

801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Rhode Island v. Innis · Swain v. State of Alabama · Griffith v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the objection is not timely made, the trial court is deprived of the opportunity to remedy the error and save the case. As a matter of common sense, the court should have the chance to hold a Batson hearing, and, if necessary, start the selection procedure over.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Court in Batson envisioned that a motion to strike would be made promptly, probably before the venire was dismissed. See [ 476 U.S. 79 ], at [99-100] n. 24, 106 S.Ct. [1712] at 1724 n. 24.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Since Batson had not been announced by the United States Supreme Court, defense counsel did not have the benefit of the procedural instructions set out in Batson . We should not decide this case based on whether the lawyers complied with Batson procedure, but should consider whether the court was placed on notice that [the appellant] alleged a systematic exclusion of members of his race. He certainly did. Since Batson , the procedural requirements have been clarified."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.