Allen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(A) Whether the extradition documents on their face are in order; (B) Whether the petitioner has been charged with a crime in the demanding state; (C) Whether the petitioner is the person named in the request for extradition; and”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. McCurley · Sonkin v. State

2. “.The general rule regarding extradition in this state is that when a governor from a demanding state requisitions extradition and certifies that the respondent committed the crime while in the demanding state, and that the duly authenticated accusatory document is genuine and states a crime under the laws of that state, such facts authorize the arrest and extradition of the defendant. The introduction of the Governor’s extradition warrant creates a presumption that all the requirements for extradition have been met. Once this prima facie showing has been made, it is the appellant’s burden to prove he is not the person wanted or was not in the demanding state at the time of the crime.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sonkin v. State