Frazier v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2000
1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Probst Ex Rel. Probst v. Seyer · Clinkenbeard v. Reinert · State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Craig · Merritt v. Matchett · Houghton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]n an action against the owner or harborer of a dog for injury inflicted by such animal, defendant’s scienter (i.e., actual or constructive knowledge) of the vicious or dangerous propensities of the dog ... is (except where removed by statute) an essential element of the cause of action and a necessary prerequisite to recovery. . . .’ ” [Citation omitted]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Farrior v. Payton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.