Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 515 U.S. 472 - Sandin v. Conner

Sandin v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

7,839
cited by 7,839 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

1,506 federal appellate · 596 district · 986 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7,839 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Wilkinson v. Austin (2005), McKune Warden et al. v. Lile (2002)

1,506 federal appellate · 596 district · 986 state decisions — followed in 46 states

3.4k01995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedConner v. Sakai (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Bell v. Wolfish

Cited together with Wolff v. McDonnell · Hewitt v. Helms · Meachum v. Fano · Farmer v. Brennan · Harlow v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7,839 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.”
    516 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “retain other protection from arbitrary state action ... within the expected conditions of confinement. They may invoke the First and Eighth Amendments and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment where appropriate, and may draw upon internal prison grievance procedures and state judicial review where available.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.