In re Lemus’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1101 · 11 U.S.C. § 1127 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 766 · 28 U.S.C. § 1408
Relies on Montana v. United States · Deans v. O'Donnell · Murphy v. O'Donnell · Elmwood Development Company Elmwood Development Company v. General Electric Pension Trust · In re McMahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the debtor is an individual, the plan may be modified at any time after confirmation of the plan but before the completion of payments under the plan, whether or not the plan has been substantially consummated, upon request of the debtor, the trustee, the United States trustee, or the holder of an allowed unsecured claim, to-- (1) increase or reduce the amount of payments on claims of a particular class provided for by the plan; (2) extend or reduce the time period for such payments; or (3) alter the amount of the distribution to a creditor whose claim is provided for by the plan to the extent necessary to take account of any payment of such claim made other than under the plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Lovey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.