Wallace v. Quarterman’s Empirical Analysis
516 F.3d 351 · 2008
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2021
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Collins v. Youngblood · California Department of Corrections v. Morales · Beazell v. State of Ohio Chatfield · Garner v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d). A state court's decision is contrary to clearly established precedent if the rule it applies”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebert v. Rogers“contradicts the governing law set forth in the [Supreme Court's] cases,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebert v. Rogers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.