Rich v. Spartis’s Empirical Analysis
516 F.3d 75 · 2008
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on United States v. Jacobson · Sobel v. Hertz, Warner & Co. · Willemijn Houdstermaatschappij, BV v. Standard Microsystems Corp. · 294 F. Supp. 2d 431 - In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation · Duferco International Steel Trading v. T. Klaveness Shipping A/S
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; (2) where there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, or either of them; (3) where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced; or (4) where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Arbitration awards are subject to very limited review in order to avoid undermining the twin goals of arbitration, namely, settling disputes efficiently and avoiding long and expensive litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Landau v. Eisenberg“an arbitration award should be enforced, despite a court's disagreement with it on the merits, if there is a barely colorable justification for the outcome reached.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Landau v. Eisenberg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.