Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 F.3d 75 - Rich v. Spartis

Rich v. Spartis’s Empirical Analysis

516 F.3d 75 · 2008

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)

Relies on United States v. Jacobson · Sobel v. Hertz, Warner & Co. · Willemijn Houdstermaatschappij, BV v. Standard Microsystems Corp. · 294 F. Supp. 2d 431 - In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation · Duferco International Steel Trading v. T. Klaveness Shipping A/S

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; (2) where there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, or either of them; (3) where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced; or (4) where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Arbitration awards are subject to very limited review in order to avoid undermining the twin goals of arbitration, namely, settling disputes efficiently and avoiding long and expensive litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an arbitration award should be enforced, despite a court's disagreement with it on the merits, if there is a barely colorable justification for the outcome reached.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.