¶1Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶3Nicholas James Queen, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied relief on the § 2255 motion by order entered on January 28, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court has decided Queen’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶4 PETITION DENIED.