Galda v. Bloustein’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Parratt v. Taylor · Perry v. Sindermann · Buckley v. Valeo · Flast v. Cohen · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“PIRG has two basic goals. One is to effect social and political change in the areas of its concern. PIRG's second goal is to involve university students in public affairs so as to broaden their educational experiences and help develop a more sophisticated and active electorate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Galda v. Bloustein“at least for purposes of the (summary judgment) motion, we must conclude that not all of PIRG's activities are truly educational or adequately linked to the University to survive the Abood standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Galda v. Bloustein“PIRG is, in large measure, a student organization and ... performs legitimate educational functions,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Galda v. Bloustein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.