Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 FSUPP 911 - Gordon v. Willis

Gordon v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
March 2005
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2005 · most notably Barefoot v. Estelle (1983), Lozada v. Deeds (1991)

28 federal appellate · 1 district ·

330198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Carafas v. J · Allen v. Williamson · Nowakowski v. Maroney · Stewart v. Beto · Dixon v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must demonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve the issues [in a different manner]; or that the questions are 'adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.'”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve the issues [in a different manner]; or that the questions are 'adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'substantial showing of the denial of [a] federal right.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.