Lambert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2001
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rideout v. United States · Bowsher v. SmithKline Corp. · Loyd v. State · Patterson v. State · Case v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As the proponent of the hearsay evidence, the State not only called the victim as a witness, but elicited from her the necessary foundational testimony regarding the specific evidentiary matters which were the subject of her prior out-of-court assertions. In addition, the victim underwent cross-examination upon such matters. This was a sufficient foundation to properly justify a Patterson hearsay rule exception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lambert v. State“regarding the specific evidentiary matters which were the subject of her prior out-of-court assertions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hendricks v. State“had not been qualified as a person with knowledge regarding the purposes and uses of the medication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nasser v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.