Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 NE2D 40 - French v. State

French v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2005

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

40198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Drollinger v. State · Wright v. State · Gillie v. State · Wilson v. State · Henson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an in-court identification by a witness who has participated in an imper-missibly suggestive out-of-court identification is admissible if the witness has an independent basis for the in-court identification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.