Abrams v. Abrams’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2024
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Malcolm v. Malcolm · Lien v. Lien · Hartpence v. Youth Forestry Camp · Hanks v. Hanks · Wallahan v. Wallahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the duration of the marriage; (2) the value of the property; (3) the age of the parties; (4) the health of the parties; (5) the parties’ competency to earn a living; (6) the contribution of each party to the accumulation of the property; and (7) the income-producing capacity of the parties’ assets.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roupe v. Roupe“property owned by each party, their relative incomes, the liquidity of the assets, and whether either party unreasonably increased the time spent on the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weekley v. Weekley“It is axiomatic that each case must be judged upon its own set of facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Grode v. Grode
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.