Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 N.W.2d 824 - State v. Webb

State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2018

18 state decisions

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Manson v. Brathwaite · Illinois v. Allen · Smith v. Al Lockhart · United States v. Swinney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The first part of the analysis requires the court to decide whether the identification procedure was in fact impermissibly suggestive. Second, if the court finds the procedure was impermissibly suggestive, then the court must determine whether, under the totality of the circumstances, an identification made by the witness at the time of trial is irreparably tainted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Losey v. State
  2. “(1) the opportunity of the witness to view the perpetrator at the time of the crime; (2) the witness’s degree of attention; (3) the accuracy of the witness’s prior description of the perpetrator; (4) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation; (5) the length of time between the crime and confrontation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Folkerts
  3. “a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Losey v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.