Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 SE2D 15 - In Re James LP

In Re James LP’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 194 W. Va. 138 - Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L. · 195 W. Va. 573 - Appalachian Power Co. v. State Tax Department · 175 W. Va. 64 - State v. Ellsworth · 182 W. Va. 615 - Benjamin R. v. Orkin Exterminating Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e apply the deferential, `clearly erroneous' standard of review to factual findings by the circuit court; we review the circuit court's legal conclusions under the non-deferential, `de novo' standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.