516 So. 2d 110 - Hardee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2012
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 339 So. 2d 1164 - Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Pridgen · 490 So. 2d 21 - State v. Kinchen · 417 So. 2d 719 - Gains v. State · 501 So. 2d 600 - Bentley v. State · 336 So. 2d 378 - Hampton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a slightly different context the supreme court has determined that whether a firearm is empty or loaded is not material to the issue of whether a person convicted of burglary had in possession a firearm for purposes of imposing a mandatory minimum sentence of three years' incarceration. Bentley v. State, 501 So.2d 600 (Fla. 1987). There is no logical distinction to be made between that application and its relevance here.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Appellant relies on Gains v. State, 417 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), disapproved on other grounds, State v. Kinchen, 490 So.2d 21 (Fla.1985). That case is distinguishable, however, because there the court found that the evidence failed to establish that the alleged “wheel man” in an armed robbery was a willing, active participant in the robbery. Here, appellant was certainly an active participant in the burglary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. A.F. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.