Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 SO2D 25 - Holt v. State

Holt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No objection to an information on the ground that it was not signed or verified, as herein provided, shall be entertained after the defendant pleads to the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The clear terms of Rule 3.140(g) mandate the determination that the objection and motion came too late.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.