516 So. 2d 474 - Hogan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2001
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 459 So. 2d 793 - Fairchild v. State · Archina v. People · Commonwealth v. Giacobbe · 440 So. 2d 278 - Sanders v. State · People v. . Doody
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court instructs the jury for the defendant that each and every material averment as to the falsity of defendant’s testimony at former trial must be proven by the testimony of two witnesses, or by one witness and corroborating evidence; beyond all reasonable doubt to every man of this jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hale v. State“when the State is unable to offer additional proof as to the precise date the accused lied, and evidence aliunde as to the truth of the matter about which the accused testified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.