Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 SO2D 525 - Ex Parte Shelby County

Ex Parte Shelby County’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 414 So. 2d 74 - Ex Parte Harrington Mfg. Co., Inc. · 350 So. 2d 405 - Alabama Youth Services Bd. v. Ellis · Ex Parte City of Birmingham · Copeland v. Loeb · 431 So. 2d 1194 - Ex Parte Ford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the City of Birmingham's purported annexation of Shelby County territory, and the ordinances and exercise of municipal authority in conjunction therewith, [were] unlawful and invalid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`a real and bona fide defendant whose interest in the result of the action is adverse to that of the plaintiff with respect to the cause of action against the other defendant.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]f venue in a particular county is proper as to one defendant, then additional claims and parties may be joined as ancillary thereto. Rule 82(c), A.R.Civ.P.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.