Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 So. 2d 656 - Woods v. Hicks

516 So. 2d 656 - Woods v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1989
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 348 So. 2d 484 - S.S. Kresge Co. v. Ruby · Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co. · 431 So. 2d 975 - Ex Parte Morrison's Cafeteria of Montgomery, Inc. · 55 Ala. App. 487 - Slay v. McKean Paint and Hardware Store, Inc. · Goza v. Goza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Courts do not favor setting aside a verdict for damages merely because in [their] opinion the jury gave too little or too much. Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co., 391 So.2d 659 (Ala.1980).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.