Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 S.W.2d 321 - Frey v. Yust

Frey v. Yust’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

8019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Suhre v. Busch · Lively v. Tabor · Cummins v. Dixon · Brown v. Childers · Starr v. Crenshaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An option is a privilege, a right of election to exercise a privilege. As such, an option constitutes a continuing offer on the part of the vendor or owner until accepted within the time and on the terms limited in the option. When accepted, a valid agreement arises supported by mutual promises. Stated more specifically, when the offer is seasonably accepted, a new bilateral contract arises, and it is this contract which is specifically enforceable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “cannot be made in some manner contrary to the method provided”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.